Bridges Updates Blog

Bridges Update 7-8-10

| Print |

 

We can hardly wait for the new Census numbers to be published this August, since they will include 2009 and will reveal much more of the impact the Great Recession has had on poverty rates. The current available data is for 2008, which is still useful, depending on how it is interpreted. Consider the graph below:
 
 
Extreme Poverty, Poverty, and Near Poverty Rates for
Children Under Age 5, by Living Arrangement: 2008
 
Source: US Census Bureau, Current Population Survey, 2009 Annual Social and Economic Supplement
 
Poverty - the Census Bureau uses a set of income thresholds that vary by family size and composition to determine who is poor; for example, the poverty threshold for a family of three is $18,310; the poverty threshold for a family of four is $21,200.
Extreme poverty - family income is below half the poverty threshold. 3,390,000 people are living in extreme poverty.
Near poverty – family income is below 200% of poverty threshold.
 
It’s noteworthy that the two columns in each category don’t add up to 100%, so there should be a third column, perhaps labeled “other”, which would at least include children who live with other relatives, who live in households where the adults are not legally married, or who are in foster care. The “other” category in extreme poverty would be at 64.6%; in poverty, 44.1%, and near poverty, 18.9%. So the information is incomplete as it is presented.
 
How do you interpret these numbers? One way would be to conclude that since children living with married parents are less likely to be living in poverty, the issue is irresponsibility on the part of men in poverty. While personal responsibility is certainly one contributing cause of poverty, there are other factors to consider. For example, if either parent (or both) cannot find work that pays enough to support the family, this is a social capital issue, not one of personal responsibility. Further, policy penalizes legally married couples seeking assistance with housing, food stamps, or other government programs. Still further, US society is undergoing a profound shift with regard to marriage; 60% of all marriages now end in divorce, which means that the number of single parent households is growing across all economic classes. 
 
Another inference from the graph: subsidized childcare is absolutely essential if single moms are going to be able to work to support their families. Without this essential resource, families will have little chance of moving toward economic stability.
 
What else can you glean from this graph?
 

Bridges Update, 06-17-10

| Print |

The impact of the Great Recession on wealth and income distribution is beginning to show up in published research. The time delay is often 2-3 years; after one group of experts gathers the basic data and verifies its accuracy, another group then analyzes it before publishing the results. So we’re just now beginning to see what has happened to people in different economic classes.
 
Wealth and income have different definitions. Wealth is usually defined as the value of the marketable assets (house, stocks, savings) an individual or family owns, minus any debts (mortgage, credit card debt). Income is what people earn from employment, stock dividends, interest on savings, or rent on properties they might own. Theoretically, people with great wealth might not have high incomes, but in reality, those at the very top of wealth distribution usually also have the most income. As of 2007, the top 1% of households owned 34.6% of all privately held marketable assets; the next 19% of households owned 50.5%. That means that just 20% of American households owned 85% of all wealth, leaving only 15% of the wealth for the bottom 80% of all households.
 
The first projections are based on the price of housing and stock in July, 2009. The last few years have seen a huge loss in housing wealth for most families, making the gap between the rich and the rest of America even greater, and increasing the number of households with no marketable assets from 18.6% to 24.1%. most Americans have been hit much harder in both wealth and income than the top 1% of American households. In a March, 2010, article, Dr. Edward Wolff of Bard College writes that the median household has experienced an “astounding” 36.1% drop in marketable assets since the 2007 peak of the housing bubble; in contrast, the wealth of the top 1% of households dropped by just 11.1% (http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp_589.pdf),. 
The top 10% of all households own 80% to 90% of stocks, bonds, trust funds, and business equity, and over 75% of non-home real estate; the top 20% have 84% of all marketable assets. G. William Domhoff, who has researched the relationships between wealth, income, and power, bluntly states, “Since financial wealth is what counts as far as the control of income-producing assets, we can say that just 10% of the people own the United States of America …the United States is a power pyramid. It’s tough for the bottom 80% - maybe even the bottom 90% - to get organized and exercise much power.” (http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html). 
 
Sobering numbers…and a challenge to those of us committed to building bridges across economic class lines – especially those of us who fall in the bottom 80-90%. Perhaps we have been given a gift: the broader context in which people in middle class and people in poverty are in the same boat when it comes to social and economic policy!
 
Check the list of upcoming Bridges trainings hosted by our partners. Click here to access the complete list.
   

Bridges Update

| Print |

May 11, 2010

Dr. Ruby Payne has written an important article entitled Moving from Middle Class to Situational Poverty – from Stability to Instability: What you can do to help your students and parents during the present economic downturn. (http://www.siskiyous.edu/class/ece26/classoctober20.pdf) Written for educators, the insights equally apply to congregations, social service agencies, and community organizations working with people who were economically stable and now are seeking assistance. 
 
Dr. Payne notes that there is great reluctance on the part of people who have been in middle class to admit that their resource base is becoming unstable…in middle class it’s usually seen as a personal failing to lose a job or not be able to pay the mortgage. So often it isn’t shared right away... Middle class folks may consider money a measure of achievement, but the hidden rules around money dictate that you don’t talk about it and that you certainly don’t ask others for it! Payne observes that it’s not only financially difficult but emotionally devastating. It impacts, identity, self-worth, and personal value. 
 
Dr. Payne suggests nine excellent, relational ways to help families deal with the shift in resources. Here’s one: DO NOT ENGAGE IN PITY. That is humiliating for the persons receiving it. If they have the courage to tell you about their situation, accept it, and give them time to talk about their thoughts and feelings. Focus the conversation on what they will DO next (notice this is concrete and specific…meeting people where they are in survival mode and helping them reclaim their ability to plan for the future.
 
Upcoming Bridges Day One training opportunities (contact Paul if you’re interested):
Three-part Monday evening series – June 7,14,21, 6-8 pm, Christ Episcopal Church
Two-part Wednesday morning series – June 9 & 16, 9 am – noon, Covenant Presbyterian Church
Motivational interviewing seminar – June 19, 9 am – noon, Urban Ministry Center
   

Bridges Update

| Print |

April 27, 2010

Bridges and Getting Ahead courses are designed to be education for transformation, not simply information!  And it’s the only kind of education we know that is actually be effective in building bridges across economic class lines. 
 
Here’s one design ingredient:  Dr. Gary Phillips, a well-known author and speaker who founded the National School Improvement Project, has sifted through the brain research on learning and discovered what we learn and actually remember a month later…
14% of what we hear
22% of what we see
30% of what we watch others do or demonstrate
42% of “sensory redundancy” (classroom rituals that repeat seeing, hearing, and doing important skills and concepts)
72% “movies of the mind” (learning is linked to remembered or imagined life experiences of the learner)
83% challenging activity (first-time or demanding action that applies the new learning)
92% of what we teach others                                   (www.docstoc.com/docs/14920950/Brain-Research-Summary/)
 
This is why the GETTING AHEAD course uses the “investigator” approach to education rather than the “banking” model of simply depositing information (read Paolo Friere’s PEDAGOGY OF THE OPPRESSED – it’s worth the time). 
 
It’s why mental models work – particularly the ones we build for ourselves, where we “see” connections we didn’t make before because we were too busy living life to think about it! 
 
It’s why images or stories that illustrate the dynamics of live in poverty or in middle class make connections for folks deeper than words – like the one we always use about the guy on the Ed Sullivan show frantically keeping a dozen plates spinning atop 8-foot poles.
 
It’s why the hidden rules come alive when people connect personal experiences that now make sense (“oh, so THAT’S why my boss did that”, she said, her eyes sparkling with insight). 
 
It’s why commissioning GA group members to do research outside class and report back to the group embeds the learnings in their minds. 
 
It’s why we want to meet regularly with folks who take the Bridges seminars and then work to apply their learnings to relationships with people in poverty.  These brave folks’ stories of interactions, of having their buttons pushed, of having to confront situations in their new friends’ lives that are far outside their own experience are “grist” for the learning and remembering mill.
 
 
 
Another item of interest:  A New York Times article on middle class folks on the edge of eviction:  http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/22/business/economy/22prevent.html?emc=eta1 
Read it through the “lens” of the mental models – notice what people from middle class and now in survival have to learn to do; notice what happens to their sense of time, self-esteem, and creativity – and what they think they need to become stable once again.
 
 
 
   

Bridges Update

| Print |

April 22, 2010

Wanda and I are constantly working on our seminar presentations to keep them up to date and to make them as relevant as possible.  As part of that process, we’ve decided to use a different size family in demonstrating that the arithmetic of life doesn’t work for people in poverty.  We had been using a family of four, but the Living Income Standard calculations from the NC Justice Institute define “four” as two adults and two children.  As most of the families with children with whom we have worked are single parent families, we’ve decided to use figures based on one adult and two children instead.
 
The 2009 Federal Poverty Guideline for a family of three – the amount (or less) that a family must bring home to qualify for Federal programs such as Section 8 Housing Vouchers - is $18,310 ($1,525.83 per month).
 
The 2008 Living Income Standard for a family of three (the latest currently available) is $41,750, which is almost 2.5 times the Federal Poverty Guideline.  Here’s the NCJI’s monthly budget for a family of three:
 
      Housing                                        $707
      Food                                             $328
      Childcare                                     $977
      Health care                                  $588
      Transportation                             $257
      Other necessities                        $279
      Taxes                                            $365
      Refundable tax credits                   (22)
 
 
Monthly LIS budget:                            $3,479.00
 
Annual LIS budget                             $41,750.00
 
Hourly wage needed                                                 $20.07
 
The hourly wage is based on a 40-hour work week, which in itself is difficult to find, let alone at $20.07 an hour!  The budget numbers are quite conservative - $328 per month for food…must not include a teenager!
 
Share these numbers with folks – they may help others begin to understand the constant struggle to survive experienced by people in poverty.
 
   

Page 1 of 2